Archive for

November 2009

Alpha release of HiveMind

Media_httpuploadwikimediaorgwikipediaenccbmenatworkbusinessasusualjpg_ivawcqpcaiwkbmj

Our first release of the HiveMind engine is imminent - it will be available by Monday morning (30th November).  This will demonstrate the core of the HiveMind Automated Expertise Discovery engine and it's ability to locate Experts, however it won't have most of the user interfaces around it.  You can however see it working.

We won't be doing a general release of this Alpha release, but if you are interested in experiencing the core functionality, then contact us and let us know; we'd be happy to arrange it for you.

Posted by Tim Bull 

Salesforce Chatter launches, more opportunities for expertise location

Media_httpcache0techcrunchcomwpcontentuploads200911chatter2jpg_ugxzabdefxcxbhf

On TechCrunch, they've just announced the launch of SalesForce Chatter: A real time social network for the enterprise.

Here at BinaryPlex we are excited by the news of any new E2.0 product, but particularly ones from players as significant as SalesForce.

As we demonstrated in our video this is really yet another silo of knowledge in which people within organisations can now demonstrate their knowledge and expertise.  It helps confirm our belief that there is a real opportunity and need for products like HiveMind which locate the expertise across the silos and help make it more discoverable to everyone in the organisation, wether they use a tool like SalesForce or not.

Posted by Tim Bull 

Here comes everybody

Here comes everybody, the power of organizing without organizations is a book by Clay Shirky that discusses the power of the group when bought together by the Internet.  One quote in particular that caught my attention is this:

Every webpage is a latent community. Each page collects the attention of people interested in its contents, and those people might well be interested in conversing with one another too. In almost all cases the community will remain latent, either because the potential ties are too weak, or because the people looking at the page are separated by too wide a gulf of time, and so on. - Page 102.

Without splitting hairs too finely (a blog or wiki is a web page after all), I do think that this is an emerging problem in the space of Enterprise 2.0 content.  As we build up internal communities around tools like Lotus Connections, Microsoft Share Point and Jive SBS, we also build legacy content.  When I read a blog post that was posted 6 months ago, I am separated by a wide gulf of time from the community that interacted with it when it was created.

We need ways of linking the conversation from yesterday with the conversations of today, to bridge this gap in time and place.  Two ways that can help with this problem are:

  1. It's all about the people - make it easy to discover the current and active experts in a particular area.
  2. Keep tags current.
HiveMind can help with both of these problems, but it's the second one I'd like to talk about now.

Having created a blog post, most users would not return to update the tags, even if they created them in the first place.  Yet particularly for emerging knowledge, the way in which we understand and describe content changes over time as new words (Web 2.0 anyone) come into existence to describe what we are doing.  Six months from now is the way you described your post the way the organisation thinks of it?

By focussing on the content and it's demonstrated expertise, HiveMind is able to understand when content demonstrates an expertise and should be tagged with it, even if the expertise the post demonstrated doesn't exist until some time AFTER the post was created.  By helping to maintain the expertise tags on content across the organisation, HiveMind can help organisations bridge the content age gap, but ensuring that like posts are tagged alike as people go about their business of creating great content to share.


Filed under  //  expertise   hivemind   tagging  
Posted by Tim Bull 

Finding the gaps between the silos

At the IBM Smarter Work Summit earlier this week, Peter Sheahan spoke about how he sees the future for business returns coming from two different sources.

  1. Continuing to further cut the bottom line (through automation and other processes).
  2. Driving innovation through finding ways to bridge the gaps between organisational silos.
The second one is where the real upside for business is.  By bridging these silos, you can bring all of your expertise to bear on problems and leverage the full knowledge of your organisation.

It's a problem that we are aware of and thinking about in our HiveMind designs.  While locating and reporting on your expertise is a good thing, is it enough?  How do we make sure that we help bridge the gaps between silos?

It's an interesting design question, because we know we are NOT some things, as much as we know we are.  For example, we are not a social network (why build yet another), so in that sense, would it make sense to provide a friending mechanism within HiveMind to help you connect to people with similar expertise?  Besides that, even if we did, what would this mechanism look like?

At the moment we are concentrating on a design that works as follows:

  • When someone in a different part of the organisation is demonstrating similar expertise to yourself, we'll let you know through update bulletins.
  • The mechanism for connecting to that person is really a facility of the other systems that you have in place, for example from HiveMind we might let you send them an e-mail, or perhaps add them to your network in Lotus Connections, Sharepoint of Jive.
We think this approach is very much in line with our design philosophy - we help return value to the other systems in the organisation by helping users make the right connections and not adding to the knowledge spaghetti by having yet another system with duplicate functionality.  At the same time we are taking a pro-active foot on helping you find the bridges that fill the gaps by letting people identify, reach out and connect to people who have knowledge that they can share.

Posted by Tim Bull 

Google Flu Trends - using signals to predict a real outcome

Today we were at the IBM Smart Work Summit in Melbourne

As we continue the conversation about HiveMind and the concept of mining the signals in an organisation to work out what people's expertise really is, one common question is "but can it work"?

Peter Sheahan had the key note speech and in it raised a great example from Google which demonstrates clearly how the concept of mining hidden signals can deliver real world value.

This comes from Google's Flu Trends site, what it shows is that by mining the common search terms related to cold and flus, they can (very) accurately track flu occurences based on searches for flu symptoms.  Not only this, it's a leading indicator over the data from Doctors which takes time to aggregate.  Similarly, we believe that by mining a broader range of signals within an organisation, for example what people blog about, e-mail about, contribute and comment on, check-in and perhaps yes, even search for in your Enterprise Search solution, we can mine a clear profile of their expertise.

I've been fascinated by these Hidden Signals in organisations for a while now.  In some ways the original inspiration for HiveMind was this Tweet back in January 2009 where I tweeted the following:

A good layoff indicator is LinkedIn, my network activity is way up - 1st action when laid off is to connect and seek recommendations. http://twitter.com/timbull/status/1159905073

Shortly after this, TechCrunch followed up with a more detailed post confirming my own suspicions.

Media_httpcache0techcrunchcomwpcontentuploads200902linkedinchartjanpng_hdzgftjfihapghf

The key take away was this message:

Total minutes spent on the site doubled in January to 96.8 million, from 47.6 million in December.

Part of what is driving all the activity is people looking for job, and helping friends who are out of work. Recommendations are up 65 percent since December, says spokesperson Kay Luo.

I then created a more detailed response http://timbull.com/hidden-signals-in-social-software that posed the following question:

Most of us are already well aware that we leave a footprint on any social networking site, and in some instances, may come to regret that photo we posted on facebook.  What I find more fascinating however is how these sites are generating new signals and measures that over time could be used to perhaps supplement or replace existing messages. One person updating there resume is not newsworthy - everyone updating it sends a strong message about job security. Good systems are those which can make visible these hidden messages and signals.  What hidden signals are you observing in other systems which provide insight (of any kind)?

With HiveMind we are building a tool to help mine these signals from organisations and turn them into expertise.  What's your thoughts?  What signals are there inside your organisation that send messages on people interests and abilities, if only there was something listening for them?

Filed under  //  expertise   flu trends   hidden signals   linkedin   mining  
Posted by Tim Bull 

Evolution of E2.0

One of the things I love about Twitter is the short-thoughts you stumble across.  A well crafted tweet is worth a thousand words perhaps?

Mike Gotta is the Enterprise 2.0 and Collaboration analyst at Burton and I've had occasional dealings with him in the past.  He's always been insightful and provided some good background analysis to what's happening in the industry.

His tweet today caught my eye:

"process-centric collaboration is quite powerful - but not a new concept - "contextual collaboration" circa 1999 kicked that off"

It's amazing how a small phrase like this can spark a lot of thoughts.

I think process-centric collaboration is where it's at, particularly for this stage of the Enterprise 2.0 lifecycle.  Does anyone remember Microsoft Works?  To be honest I thought it was dead, but I see that it's still alive in into Version 9.0!  If you've never heard of it, that's probably because the concept of a single monolithic suite to do spreadsheets, word processing etc. never really took off in business.  Sure we have office suites, but these are branded products rather than an all-in-one deal.  Why? I'm guessing that for all but the most trivial use cases, Microsoft Works didn't address business needs.

Now clearly you can't compare a modern E2.0 suite with Microsoft Works, still I wonder how this strategy plays out.  Process centric collaboration doesn't neccessarily dictate a single tool, however I do believe tools geared to your critical business processes will be more effective.

So there's a thought - what is your critical business process and how would an Enterprise 2.0 tool align with this?  In a lot of organisations, this is probably a Knowledge Management question and in my own experience and observations, I'd say that's where most people are looking to implement these tools.  To get the knowledge of the organisation out of the inbox and to make it more accessible and discoverable.

I can summarise it like this, process centric collaboration is where I believe the real value in Enterprise 2.0 will be derived, the challenge in many organisations is that there will be multiple processes and probably multiple tools.  HiveMind can help bridge the knowledge gap between the silos, cross-tagging and discovering expertise regardless of the process it's utilised in.

Filed under  //  analysis   e2.0  
Posted by Tim Bull 

What a tangled web we weave

Across on Brian Solis' blog, Damien Basille added a guest post on "Social Media Influencers are not Traditional Influencers".

While this has a more external focus than HiveMind which is primarily internal, this particular quote really resonated with me.

The one question you need to ask yourself is this: what is my purpose for connecting? Connecting just to connect is aimless.

I think this gets to the heart of why organisations are implementing Enterprise 2.0 systems; because they believe that there is more to it than just "friending" a colleague.  Business is business and open sharing of information needs to also have a tangible return.  This was a theme picked up the E2.0 Customer Council in their recent talk at the Enterprise 2.0 Conference. To quote Greg Lowe:

How do you tie better collaboration to the bottom line? We can save time finding answers, etc. and you can do some correlation, and that’s your cost savings or productivity increase.

It's been interesting to reflect on this briefly.  Clearly from a PR point of view (Brian Solis) the question is about finding Influencers and as Damien's post rightly points out there is a future of influence yet to arrive.  Some of the types of tools that will deliver these feature are similar in concept to HiveMind, while others are far wider reaching in scope.  While I think that seeking influencers (a PR related neccessity) is somewhat different from seeking expertise (an organisational need), it's clear that the next wave of tools will be smart systems that draw from the digital signals you leave to try and automatically understand what it is that you know.

Within the Enterprise, this is a practical function that assists you in automatically sharing what you do with others, and to a degree there is a personal ROI (your employer pays you for your expertise).  Does this have different implications when it's taken outside the Firewall and applied to the world in general?  It will be interesting to watch as this space develops and matures both inside and outside the firewall.

Filed under  //  ROI   hivemind   influence  
Posted by Tim Bull 

Introducing HiveMind

We've launched our first product video over on the website and thought we would also share it here.  This is meant to be a brief, highlevel introduction to HiveMind and the problem that it's trying to solve.  Comments and feedback are welcome.

Filed under  //  hivemind   introduction   video  
Posted by Tim Bull